will it improve the system of checks and balances and enchance the seperation of powers in the -

"Answer:

No.

Explanation:

It's better if there is one centralized basis and ground of reason and discussion so that there is a wider spectrum on whether a specific appointment is to be confirmed by the entirety of COMAPPT unless the government; particularly the executive branch, use the Commission on Appointments for the sole benefit of their political party or generally for a cause that sacrifices the safety and opinion of the people of the Philippines and the national civil status and appearance on the world stage, especially given the fact that COMAPPT should act as a restraint or barrier against the abuse of the appointing authorities with the purpose of ensuring that the power of disapproval and rightful disagreement* is exercised without bias to protect and enhance public interest of the Philippine people. Additionally, the president should be more involved when it comes to the formulation and execution of decisions as well as information on the appointment of senior government workers and public servants, especially those working with the judiciary as they hold the choice to make rightful execution of the law enacted by the legislature. Lastly, when the entirety of the government is involved with the decision of appointing a specific government official, there is less chance for 'sour relations' between the branches and potential miscommunication and chaotic disagreement especially when a disliked person is appointed to a higher position in government."